Popular Articles

New Ovarian Transplant Technique Could Expand Use Of Procedure To Preserve Fertility
Two recent advancements in ovarian transplant techniques could potentially expand the availability of the procedure for women seeking to avoid fertility problems as they age, researchers reported Monday at a meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, the AP/Yahoo! News reports. According to the AP/Yahoo! News, ovary transplants traditionally have been performed on women with cancer as a method of preserving fertility after chemotherapy or other treatments that can affect the reproductive system. The procedure involves removing the ovaries before treatment and re-implanting them after treatment is complete. Because only a handful of these procedures have been successful, ovarian transplants have been an option only for women with serious diseases. However, as more women delay having children until their 30s or 40s, researchers say the new techniques, in theory, could make it simpler for healthy younger women to have an ovary removed, frozen and then re-implanted later in life when they are ready to have children.The first study examined how many eggs were lost or preserved in fresh and frozen ovarian tissue of 15 young women prior to the start of cancer treatment. According to the study, there was no difference in the quantity of eggs in the fresh tissue and in the ovaries frozen using a new ultra-fast technique. The study found that about 50% of a woman"s eggs were lost using the traditional, slow-freezing methods of preserving the ovaries.The second study reported on a new surgical technique to restore an ovary"s function after transplantation. For the study, Pascal Piver of Limoges University Hospital and colleagues divided the transplant process into two separate procedures in an attempt to more quickly re-establish blood and hormone supplies to the ovary. In the first procedure, the researchers performed a graft of small pieces of ovarian tissue to prompt blood vessels to grow. They performed the ovary transplant three days later. The technique was successful in a woman who lost fertility because of treatment for sickle cell anemia.Sherman Silber, director of the St. Louis Infertility Center in Missouri and a researcher for the first study, said the new techniques "could dramatically expand our reproductive life span." He added, "This is not an experimental procedure for cancer patients anymore. The question is whether more women should be able to have this option" (Cheng, AP/Yahoo! News, 6/29).
diet pills Prezzi dentisti croazia
With Shrinking Budgets, States Cutting Health Services
As state revenues continue their downturn due to the recession, 16 states are trying to find ways to deal with increased health care costs, The New York Times reports: "The carnage in state budgets is getting worse, a report said Thursday, with places like Arizona being hurt by falling revenue on multiple fronts, like personal income and sales taxes. Other states are having mixed experiences, with some tax categories stable, or even rising, even as others fall off the map."
News of the day
Daily Potassium Citrate Wards Off Kidney Stones In Seizure Patients On High-fat Diet
Children on the high-fat ketogenic diet to control epileptic seizures can prevent the excruciatingly painful kidney stones that the diet can sometimes cause if they take a daily supplement of potassium citrate the day they start the diet, according to research from Johns Hopkins Children"s Center.
Endocrinology

Sunitinib Shows Promising Results In Advanced Kidney Cancer Patients With Poor Prognosis

Sunitinib prolongs progression-free and overall survival, and is safe and well tolerated in advanced kidney cancer (metastatic renal cell carcinoma) patients with a poor prognosis such as the elderly and those whose cancer has spread to the brain, finds an Article published Online First (http://www.thelancet.com) and in the August edition of The Lancet Oncology. Sunitinib is an oral targeted drug that attacks cancer by inhibiting tumour growth and starving the tumour of blood, reducing its ability to divide and grow. In previous trials sunitinib has shown clear benefit in patients with advanced kidney cancer and has been approved worldwide for first and second-line treatment in these patients. However, certain patients with advanced kidney cancer-often those with a poor prognosis such as those whose cancer has spread to the brain, those with a poor performance status (PS), and the elderly-are often excluded or inadequately represented in clinical trials. Thus, little is known about the activity, safety, and tolerability of sunitinib in these patients. To resolve this uncertainty, Martin Gore and colleagues conducted an international expanded-access trial including subgroups of patients with advanced kidney cancer not usually entered into clinical trials, or those being treated in countries where the drug is not yet approved who would not normally receive the drug. In total, 4,564 patients from 52 countries were recruited between June 2005 and December 2007. These included four subgroups of patients with brain metastases (321), poor performance status (582), non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (588), and patients aged 65 years or older (1,418). Patients received 50mg of sunitinib once daily in repeated 6-week cycles of 4 weeks of treatment followed by 2 weeks off. Tumour response, toxicity, and adverse events were assessed at regular intervals. Overall, findings showed that sunitinib can be given safely and is well tolerated in all four subgroups of patients that might be expected to have a lower tolerance to therapy than the broader advanced kidney cancer patient population. Indeed, the safety profile was found to be very similar to that reported in previous trials and the overall incidence of adverse events was slightly less. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea (44%) and fatigue (37%). Importantly, there were no differences in incidences of grade 3 and 4 AEs between the overall population and patients with brain metastases, poor PS, non-clear RCC, and the elderly-with fatigue (8%) and thrombocytopenia (8%) reported as the most common. Median progression-free and overall survival were 10.9 and 18.4 months respectively, an improvement on historical data. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 17%, with all four subgroups showing clear evidence of response-brain metastases (12%), non-clear RCC (11%), poor PS (9%), and the elderly (17%). The authors say that these results should: "Encourage the study of targeted agents in subgroups of patients otherwise excluded from trials and therefore potentially disadvantaged." In an accompanying Reflection and Reaction comment, Dr Joaquim Bellmunt, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain and and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, and Dr Toni K Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, say: "As with sorafenib, the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in an older population are confirmed and evidence shows that age alone should not be a deterrent from attempting therapy. However, patients with brain metastases, non-clear-cell histology, and poor performance status benefit less from sunitinib, despite good drug tolerance, suggesting the need for prospective studies in these subpopulations. Thus, claiming sunitinib as a "standard" in these subgroups remains controversial. An oncologist might not have access to such trials in practice, however, and based on available information the use of sunitinib may be justified in these subpopulations." Link to article, reflection and reaction The Lancet Oncology


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):