Popular Articles

Blogs Comment On 'Common Ground' Bill, Abortion Coverage In Health Reform Legislation, Other Topics
The following summarizes selected women"s health-related blog entries.~ "Democratic Bill Could Be a Preview of Obama"s Abortion Plan," Dan Gilgoff, U.S. News & World Report"s "God and Country": A recently introduced bill aimed at reducing the need for abortion is "big news because moderate to liberal faith-based advocates are urging the White House to adopt the bill ... as the core of its forthcoming "common ground" plan on abortion and reproductive health," Gilgoff writes. Some conservative religious groups, including the Southern Baptist Convention and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, "have warned the White House" that the bill is a "deal breaker" for them because of its support for comprehensive sex education and contraception, he writes. The White House "has refused to say which way it"s leaning," Gilgoff writes, adding the Obama administration could "buck" the groups that support the bill and "get behind" the Pregnant Women Support Act, "which is generally considered more robust on reducing demand for abortions and which leaves out contraceptive funding." However, he concludes, "that would be a pretty big surprise" (Gilgoff, "God and Country," U.S. News & World Report, 7/23).~ "New Report: Abortion Providers = American Human Rights Defenders, Now Under Increasing Attack," Jodi Jacobson, RH Reality Check: A new Center for Reproductive Rights report "calls on both the federal and state governments to address the growing threats against and stigmatization and abuse of abortion providers throughout the United States," Jacobson writes. The report "focuses on a key obstacle to the realization of women"s reproductive rights ... and recognizes their work as human rights defenders," she writes, adding that the U.S. has "historically been a leader both in creating and in encouraging accountability to human rights principles throughout the world." However, "[a]ccess to reproductive health care generally and abortion care specifically are basic human rights largely ignored within the context of U.S. domestic politics," Jacobson writes, noting that abortion access in the U.S. "has been increasingly limited due to the range of obstacles created through anti-choice advocacy." The report highlights several "types of rights violations [that] are most pervasive in limiting women"s choices and the rights of abortion providers," including "intimidation and harassment," "stigma" and "legal restrictions." The report makes a "series of recommendations for change at the state and local level for changes in policy and in law enforcement practices, as well as for the federal government, medical community and non-governmental organizations," Jacobson concludes, adding that the report "makes a special plea for the United Nations Special Rapporteur to document violations of women"s human rights in the United States" (Jacobson, RH Reality Check, 7/22).~ "Sixteen Governors Call on Congress To Include Medicaid Family Planning State Option in Health Reform," Jodi Jacobson, RH Reality Check: "Sixteen governors have written a letter to both Senate and House Leadership "expressing strong support for the Medicaid Family Planning State Option,"" which is included in President Obama"s fiscal year 2010 budget proposal, Jacobson writes. The governors wrote, "Many of our states have created family planning expansion programs, though we have done so with great difficulty," adding, "Since the early 1990s, 27 states have been granted federal waivers to expand their Medicaid family planning coverage. These demonstration projects have been unqualified successes, providing care to millions of women while saving states [millions] of dollars." Jacobson continues, "The current Medicaid waiver process, however, "puts unnecessary roadblocks in the way of our efforts to maintain and expand coverage for family planning services,"" according to the governors. She adds, "Passing this law as part of health care reform "would give us the needed flexibility to quickly and efficiently expand cove

Cisplatin/S-1 Offers Important Benefits Over Treatment Standard In Advanced Gastric Cancer
ORLANDO - Cisplatin/S-1 (CS) is non-inferior to cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (CF) for the treatment of advanced gastric/gastro-esophageal carcinoma and at the same time offers important safety improvements, according to phase III results released recently at a meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO).
News of the day
Reform Bill Details Emerge, Lobbyists Gear Up For Fight
Industry groups reacted "warily" this weekend to a draft of the Senate HELP (Health, Education, Labor and Pensions) Committee"s health overhaul plan. The first details emerged late Friday and lobbyists began speaking up, USA Today reports:
Endocrinology

Analysis: How Will $155 Billion Deal With White House Really Affect Hospitals?

When hospitals agreed to accept a $155 billion pay cut from the federal government to help Washington raise money for reform efforts earlier this month, it was "to the amazement of many," the Economist reports. "How can they justify giving away such a vast sum? There are several explanations, not all of them altruistic. Taken together, they show that the industry"s leaders are bracing themselves for a period of upheaval." Here are some motivating factors, according to the Economist: The industry will gain new customers from expanded access to health care, a chief goal of reform, the American Hospital Association says. Under the current system, hospitals treat lots of uninsured people who don"t pay their bills, netting around $34 billion in uncompensated care in 2007. Even though the government gives them money for some of this, they say that compensation fails to make them whole. "The huge sums the hospitals stand to gain from reducing such losses make even $155 billion over ten years look like a reasonable amount of money to sacrifice to secure such a bonanza," the Economist says. In addition, hospitals have sought to remain at the health reform negotiating table in hopes of thwarting plans for a new, government-run insurer they say would undercut their pricing and changes in the tax status of nonprofit hospitals that would cost many millions. Another "explicit concession wrung by the hospital bosses from the White House was a promise to crack down on clinics owned by doctors," which represent potential, unwanted competition for established hospitals. "As this back-room deal illustrates, the strongest motives behind the hospitals" ostensibly generous price cut were self-serving ones: to reduce competition, not boost it, and to head off any increase in government influence over their price," the Economist reports (7/16). Meanwhile, in Cook County, officials are complaining that health reform could harm Stroger Hospital, in Chicago, Chicago Public Radio reports. Its primary business is treating the uninsured and poor. "Those who have insurance don"t necessarily go to a safety net hospital," said Warren Batts, the chairman of the board that oversees Cook County"s health system. If that trend continues in a post-reform world, the hospital could see a 40 percent cut in the $85 million Washington pays them to treat the uninsured, with few gains of paying customers (Spitzer, 7/16). This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at kaiserhealthnews.org. © Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):